On To Round 2
The Red Sox beat the best team in baseball last night and they didn't deserve to. Just ask the Angels.
They managed to take 3 of 4 from LA and while it wasn't pretty, it worked.
The irony of last night's game was that Mike Scioscia, who has the reputation of being a master of manufacturing runs, went to the well one too many times. In the 9th inning, with a man on 3rd and 1 out, Scioscia ordered a squeeze. The problem, as most of know by now is that the Angels' Erick Aybar missed the pitch allowing Jason Varitek to tag the runner out before getting to third.
The squeeze is one of those plays that when it works against your team, it just feels awful (I'm writing from a fan's perspective), but when it blows up in the oppositions face, well, there's a feeling of "serves you right." I guess it's the macho notion that runs should be scored via slugging, not bunting. That being said, I have no problem with the squeeze as a legitimate method of scoring, but the primitive part of me thinks it's inherently wrong.
Now if I'm the Angels players, I would be very upset, they did win 100 regular season games and probably had high expectations. Most of them spoke of being angry and frustrated about the loss. Pitcher John Lackey took it a step further "It's way different than last year. We are way better than they are. We lost to a team not as good as us."
Lackey went on to say, "[Referring to Sunday's game] they scored on a pop fly they called a hit, which is a joke. "[Tonight], they score on a broken-bat ground ball and a fly ball anywhere else in America. And [Pedroia's] fist-pumping on second like he did something great."
Classy Lackey, classy. I know you are angry, but try being mature, or maybe that's as mature as you get.
No matter the outcome of the 2008 season for the Red Sox, it should be interesting when the Red Sox face Lackey in 2009. I think Pedroia will try to mix it up a bit. Perhaps by using the Trot Nixon "oops the bat slipped out of my hands while swinging and whizzed right by your head" technique. We shall see.
On to Tampa Bay. This series should be exciting and difficult. More on that later.
Notes: Mike Lowell was removed from the active roster because of his hip. In yet another example Red Sox management reads this site, they acted on a specific recommendation that I made. Yes, I know all...some...very little...whatever.
Lowell was not helping the team and it just makes sense to let him heal. Lowell fully endorsed the move recognizing that his physical condition made playing baseball effectively unlikely.
Lowell was replaced on the active roster by Gil Velazquez. It is near impossible Velazquez finds himself in this situation. As a non hitting career minor leaguer, Velazquez has turned his talents with his glove into a playoff roster spot. Wow. At 28 years old (29 in 10 days), he toiled in the minors until September of this year. A good story, but I'm certainly hoping I don't see him play an inning unless it is in a blow-out.
Round 2.
Comments
Why do you care so much what the Angels said, you beat them! Lackey was frustrated, you would be too if you beat a team eight-of-nine in the regular season, won 100 games and then went down in flames in the playoffs.
If Pedroia was on any other team you would hate him and you know it.
Posted by: Peter
|
October 7, 2008 07:18 PM
|
poor Lackey...ask him how many misplays his fielders (on the better team) made throughout the 4 games.
Many is the answer.
The bloop that was called a hit, I have no problem if they rule that an error.
The play on the ground ball by Ellsbury? I realize they probably weren't gonna double him up, but on the other side, did you see how off balance Jacoby was after making contact, it's not like he was out of the box fast.
Outfielders played defense like my 10 yr old's team. Afraid of the wall (in home park no less).
Texiera is a gold glover, no doubt he saved them 3 or 4 runs this series. Put an average 1B there and the Angels might get blown out of a game along the way.
Lackey has been owned by the Sox. He acts immature and looks like an idiot. Shut up and win.
BTW, nice division you play in out there, perhaps that has something to do with 100 wins?
19 games against Seattle, the A's and Texas each?
36-21 against the three of them. Not bad. .631 winning percentage in division vs. .617 overall, yep, feasted on the coastal buddies.
Lackey crapping on Fenway (Pedroia's double), wow, now we see the problem...stadium envy...go back to your freakn' monkeys Lackey...
Posted by: blmeanie
|
October 7, 2008 07:19 PM
|
Peter - losers can't talk smack.
Not sure exactly what Pedroia did wrong? Help me on that one, please.
The guy plays harder than anybody else out there, look at the slow roller that he comes in on and throws his body recklessly at the ball to save the play. He knew he would hit the ground hard, did it anyway without thinking.
That is a huge reason the Angels are not ready to win. They played afraid to hit the wall, they did not make plays (other than Tex).
Tell me if you view Jeter differently than Pedroia? I respect Jeter a ton, hate that he makes a difference over the years against the Sox. Is he the most talented player, I don't think so, nor is Pedroia. They both will it on top of the talent.
Name an Angel that was willing to get hurt to make a play...just one.
Yet Pedroia plays with abandon, Youk slides into the dugout netting to save a ball from going in and a base.
Attitude rules in close games, the Sox have it, the Angels don't and may never get it.
Posted by: blmeanie
|
October 7, 2008 07:27 PM
|
Come on BL, the guy just lost someone shoved a microphone in his face and that's what happens. He was pissed off and he should be.
As for Pedroia, I didn't see the play, but Pedroia does not remind me of Jeter. Jeter is not one to express emotions on the field-ever. Plenty of Yankees have (Paul O'Neil) and do (Joba Chamberlain) but if you think about it those are the guys who annoy you when you are rooting for the other team. Pedroia is one of those guys to me. Nothing against how he plays, I like that part, just don't need to see the rest of it. (And your closer is the biggest offender in my mind)
And there is just something about the Red Sox in the playoffs that makes the Angels run and hide. No idea why, but it is weird.
One last thing, whatever team gives F-Rod a ton of $$ this offseason is stupid.
Posted by: Peter
|
October 7, 2008 07:42 PM
|
ok, point taken on Pedroia, pest for sure, he is what Danny Ainge was as a Celtic, I get it.
The thing that set me off was that there seemed to be a lack of respect for the World Champions, hence the sore loser tag for Lackey.
Posted by: Peter | October 7, 2008 08:10 PM |
Peter, you are right, Lackey was frustrated to be sure and I can only imagine (since I don't play baseball for a living) that he let his emotions get the better of him.
But, it's one thing to say we are the better team, and it is another to bring an opponents name into things. That's getting personal.
As for Pedroia, he is a pest, but plays the game the right way and is always at 100%. To your point about me hating him if he were on another team. Hate is far too strong a word. I equate his style to that of an agitator in hockey. Not a goon, but someone that never lets you relax, is always taking the body, will chase down an icing, will give you a face wash if he thinks it'll help. I have a good deal of respect for players like that even if I am frustrated that they are having such an impact on the ice against my team.
So I would say I'd respect Pedroia, I find him endlessly frustrating to play against, but I wouldn't say "I hate him."
I reserve that for bad people...like Brett Myers.
Posted by: andy
|
October 8, 2008 08:51 AM
|
Is Lackey a free agent, ? does anyone know? If so he would fit perfectly on the Yanks, we would have another guy whom the redsox hate, more drama in the Bronx, Lackey if you want to have some fun we need a # 2 starter.
Posted by: michael danza | October 8, 2008 03:39 PM |
Andy- There are degrees of hate. There is the way I feel about you and compared to that Pedroia isn't even in the same ballpark!
Posted by: Peter
|
October 8, 2008 06:16 PM
|
Michael
That would certainly spice things up but the Angels have an option for $9-million on him next season. I would almost guarantee they exercise it.
Posted by: Peter
|
October 8, 2008 06:16 PM
|
thank you Peter for the info,9 mil. in todays market is cheap for that type of talent.When the Yanks hear the Angles, they leave the bats and gloves in the trunks of their cars, boy the Angles must be so frustrated not to the Yanks in the first round again,, Torii hunter hit 278 this year, look what he did to us, Kendrick, Anderson , Figgins and Mickey Mouse and Minny mouse any one with that uniform...how can you figure...
Posted by: michael danza | October 9, 2008 10:03 PM |